How we grade the evidence
Each attribution on this site carries two grades. The evidence tier grades the source: how strong a kind of record it is. The status grades the answer: how sure we are of the maker. The two can differ. A strong source may point to the maker only indirectly, and a weaker one may name it outright.
The six evidence tiers
Tier 1 is the strongest kind of source and tier 6 the weakest.
How status maps to language
The evidence sets the status, and the status sets the wording. A product is confirmed only when a tier 1–4 source directly names the maker of that exact product. It is probable when the evidence is strong but indirect, rumored when only tier 6 community reporting names a maker, and unknown when nothing at tiers 1–5 holds up. Each status allows one form of wording:
“is manufactured by X, per [the recall notice / TTB record / court filing]” — a plain statement, with the source cited.
“evidence indicates / points to X” — never “is made by X” as a bare fact.
“is rumored (unverified) to be made by X” — shown, but never named as the maker in a heading or fact sentence.
“no reliable public evidence identifies the manufacturer” — no guess, and no company named as the maker.
Corrections policy
We would rather be corrected than wrong. When a correction is substantiated, we make it promptly and note it in the change log with its date.
If you spot an error or have a primary source we missed, email hello@whoreallymakes.com with the product and the source, and we’ll check it.